The Second Reading for today (First Sunday of Lent, Year C)
was taken from Rom 10:8-13:
“Scripture says: The word, that is the faith we proclaim, is very near to you, it is on your lips and in your heart. If your lips confess that Jesus is Lord and if you believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, then you will be saved. By believing from the heart you are made righteous; by confessing with your lips you are saved. When Scripture says: those who believe in Him will have no cause for shame, it makes no distinction between Jew and Greek: all belong to the same Lord who is rich enough, however many ask for His help, for everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”
This passage of Scripture contains within it a doctrine that
was at the heart of the Protestant Reformation – the doctrine of justification.
The Catholic Church has always taught that justification is God making the
sinner righteous; and that this takes place principally in the waters of baptism
where all our sins are washed away and we are made new creatures in Christ by
the grace of God.
In opposition to this, the Protestant Reformers began to
teach that justification is not about God making a sinner righteous. “NO!” they
said – justification is a legal transaction whereby God declares the condemned
sinner (who believes in the Lord Jesus Christ) as righteous based solely on the
merits of Christ.
In other words, according to the Reformers, the Christian
was still naught but a vile and condemned sinner standing before God, his
Divine Judge. But instead of God pronouncing rightful damnation upon him, He would
see instead the blood of Christ applied by the sinner’s faith and declare the
sinner as righteous. For them, the Christian remained incapable of any
righteousness; but God would see not his filth but rather the righteousness of
Christ which clothed him.
Furthermore, the Reformers went on to teach the separation
of justification and sanctification. Justification, according to them, was the once-for-all transaction whereby
the sinner was declared righteous; whereas sanctification was the ongoing
process whereby the sinner progressively grows in righteousness (or is made righteous)
– a process that would continue until the believer is completely conformed to
the image of Christ and finally glorified in Heaven. This legal transaction (or
justification) they say, took place on the Cross when Jesus took our sin upon
Himself, and imputed His righteousness to us in place of our sin. As such, the
believer remains a sinner...but a sinner covered by the blood of Christ. Or as Martin
Luther put it: We are “snow-covered dung”.
And since it was a once-for-all transaction, the person justified
(or “declared righteous”) would remain justified forever [and so they also
taught that true Christians could never “lose their salvation”]. In this way they
claimed that the Catholic Church (by teaching that justification is God making
the sinner righteous) actually confused justification and sanctification.
Now, this might seem like a nice, neat little system to
follow; and it may seem at first glance to give more honour to Christ. But, upon
further examination, it can be seen that it is flawed at its very core and that
the Catholic position is most consistent with Sacred Scripture and with reason.
Firstly, to
declare that a sinner is righteous (i.e. "not a sinner") is like saying that a
murderer is not a murderer; or that a thief is not a thief i.e. it is a lie at
worst and a contradiction at best. We know that God cannot lie (Tit 1:2);
neither can He deceive nor be deceived (CCC #156). So, He will never declare
that something is what it isn’t i.e. He will never declare that a sinner is righteous
(or “not a sinner”).
Secondly, the
idea that justification is not making the sinner righteous, but only declaring
him righteous, is unscriptural. In the passage cited for today’s Second
Reading, we read:
“By believing from the heart you are made righteous” – Rom 10:11
“Therefore just as one man’s trespass led to condemnation for all, so one man’s act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all. For just as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous” – Rom 5:18-19 (NRSV)
On this note, I would add that the Reformed position is not
completely wrong. There is nothing wrong with saying that justification
is God’s declaration that we are righteous. However, it is not the contradictory
legal declaration that the Reformers insisted on. Rather, according to the
Catholic Church’s teaching, God’s declaration that we are righteous is based on
truth. In other words, God declares that we are righteous, because He has already made us
righteous. Not unlike the fact that St. John elsewhere tells us that “we are called
the children of God; because that is what we are” (see 1 Jn 3:1).
Thirdly,
justification and sanctification cannot be separated as neatly as the
Protestant Reformers devised. Rather, what we see in Scripture is that
justification and sanctification are often used interchangeably and, in essence,
they deal with the same thing e.g.:
“...you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.” – 1 Cor 6:11
Sadly, the Protestant Reformers, in their misguided zeal,
got the doctrine of justification wrong. Whilst their intention was to give
more honour and glory to Christ, what they actually achieved was a detraction
of glory because their teaching on justification leads logically to the implication
that God is a liar. And because of this, we should never cease to pray for our
Protestant brothers and sisters in Christ, that God would allow the scales of “Catholic
antagonism” to fall from their eyes and to see that the Holy Catholic Church
has always been, and will always remain, the pillar and foundation of Truth
– because she is nothing less than the Body of our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus
Christ.
"Furthermore, the Reformers went on to teach the separation of justification and sanctification. Justification, according to them, was the once-for-all transaction whereby the sinner was declared righteous; whereas sanctification was the ongoing process whereby the sinner progressively grows in righteousness (or is MADE righteous) – a process that would continue until the believer is completely conformed to the image of Christ and finally glorified in Heaven."
ReplyDeleteAs a Baptist, I found the deficient teaching on sanctification even more disturbing than the confusion over being "made righteous." The idea that I WAS SAVED no matter how I lived, that sanctification was like a decoration - beautiful but totally optional - was a sour note in the melody of my Christian experience. I was going straight to Heaven when I died, my church told me, as long as I "knew that I knew that I knew" that I was! I know now as a Catholic that God will never rest until I am made the saint that He has called me to be. If His work in me is not finished in this life, He will put me through Purgatory until I am what He has called me to be. What a glorious thought that the saints in Heaven aren't just jerks whom God calls "righteous" - they are men and women who have actually been MADE righteous!
I loved this - thanks, Justin!